I've been noticing something this week.
Not in coaching.
In conversations with friends. With family. At the gym. On the phone, in person, at lunch, out and about.
It's the way I've been catching myself listening.
Someone begins telling a story.
A few sentences in, I already know where I think it's going.
I start organizing what I want to say back. The question that might move us forward. The reassurance that might help. The perspective they may not have considered.
Outwardly, it probably looks like I'm listening.
Internally, I'm already somewhere else.
I'm trying to think of the right question. The right response. The thing that might help.
The conversation is still happening.
I've left it.
For a long time I thought that was what efficient listeners did. We paid attention, found the thread, and helped people move toward it. Quickly.
I'm not sure of that at all, anymore.
Something about that explanation feels too simple.
It's also a little too flattering. It lets me call the leaving a form of care.
And truthfully, the conversations I remember most aren't the ones where someone said exactly the right thing.
They're the ones where nobody seemed to be trying to get anywhere.
There was enough room for something unexpected to arrive.
I've started wondering whether I've been confusing movement with progress.
They're not the same thing at all.
Movement feels productive. Questions lead to answers. Problems lead to solutions. Decisions get made. There is something reassuring about that. It gives us the feeling that we're being useful.
Progress is quieter.
Sometimes it looks like someone stopping in the middle of a sentence because they've just heard themselves.
Sometimes it's the long silence after neither person reaches for the next question.
Sometimes it's realizing the answer wasn't waiting at the end of the conversation. It was waiting underneath it.
The temptation, of course, is to help.
The moment another person's uncertainty becomes visible, something in us wants to reduce it. We explain. Reframe. Encourage. Interpret. We move to the next question before the last answer has fully landed.
It's generous.
It's caring.
And sometimes it interrupts the very thing we're hoping to support.
I've begun noticing this far beyond conversations.
It shows up in leadership.
A manager asks for feedback, then fills the silence before the employee finishes thinking. Over time, the employee learns the question wasn't really a question.
It shows up in relationships.
One partner apologizes before they've fully understood the hurt. The apology ends the discomfort before the conversation has finished speaking.
It shows up in parenting.
A child comes home discouraged, and within moments we're searching for the silver lining. We offer reassurance to a mind that isn't available for reassurance yet. What the child can still receive is our presence. What we hand them instead are words.
Even our relationship with ourselves isn't immune.
A difficult feeling appears, and almost immediately we begin asking how to skip beyond it. We reach for an explanation before we've made room for the experience itself.
As though every uncomfortable experience arrives needing a solution.
I'm no longer convinced that's true.
I wonder whether some experiences arrive asking for something much less dramatic.
Not insight.
Not action.
Not even understanding.
Just enough room to become themselves.
I've noticed something else.
When another person's uncertainty becomes uncomfortable, we often mistake our discomfort for their need.
The urgency belongs to us.
Perhaps that's why the conversations that stay with us years later rarely hinge on brilliant advice.
They hinge on the feeling that someone stayed.
Not because they had nowhere else to be.
Because they resisted the urge to make something happen before whatever was already happening had a chance to unfold.
That kind of presence is harder than it sounds.
It asks us to tolerate the discomfort of not knowing.
To stay without reaching.
To trust something we can't yet see.
I don't think this is only about conversations.
I think it's about the way we move through life.
How often do we rush ourselves because stillness feels like failure?
How often do we call something "stuck" simply because it isn't moving at the speed of comfort?
How often do we interrupt our own becoming because waiting feels too much like doing nothing?
Those questions have been following me around lately.
Not because I have answers.
Because I keep recognizing the places where I've been too eager to arrive.
Too quick to hand someone else a conclusion.
Too quick to hand one to myself.
What This Comes Down To
There seems to be a quiet difference between helping something happen and making room for it to happen.
From the outside they can look almost identical.
The same conversation.
The same pause.
The same question.
But they arise from different places.
One is trying to create movement.
The other is willing to trust that movement has its own timing.
I'm still learning to recognize the difference.
Usually just before I reach for something.
And decide, instead, to stay.
A few questions I've been sitting with
-
When someone shares something difficult with you, what happens inside you, before you respond?
-
What problem are you trying to solve that may only be asking to be witnessed?
-
What changes if you stop measuring by how quickly something moves?
0 comments